This isn’t an Ada question specifically, but I am evaluating some licenses for my Ada code. I currently have been using GPLv3 with runtime exception, but I do feel it can get a bit murky to explain to folks and I was looking at the MPL 2.0 license and on the surface it looks simpler and it appears to do something I want and that the GPLv3 does not: give me copy left protections at the source file level (vs library level). It lets me enforce that uses of my code (and mods of it) are the only files that require supplying source for in a larger compilation project.
So my question(s): Does anyone have any experience using the MPL 2.0 license and have any experience on it they’d like to share (good, bad, gotchas, etc.)?
I’m just trying to fish out if it is something that I may want to switch to. In general, I like that it is a file based copy left license so it can be used by others and still retains the “supply source” for my contribution without burdening the rest of the projects it may be used in. I like that it seems to have some protections against patent trolling with respect to my code. It is still GPL compatible (at least the version I am looking to use is) so it should interoperate with other Ada code.
If it isn’t a good option, are there any similar file based copy left licenses to look into?
Reference:
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/2.0/