I think it does make sense, though a lot of its ideas seem like they would be realized in Task and DSA — see this — and ruminate on it a bit: a real rewrite involves leveraging the special features of the new language, rather than just mere transliteration.
Iron Man - 1976 : 17 proposals, 4 selected : «Green», «Red», «Blue», «Yellow»
Steel Man - 1978 : «Green» [Cii-Honeywell Bull], «Red» [Intermetrix].
Pebble Man - 1978/1979
1979-05-02 : «Green» won the competition
1980 July: Definitive version proposed to ANSI
1980 December 10 — MIL-STD-1815. (Cf. Lady Ada birthday 1815-12-10)
1983 April — Awarded ANSI standard — Ada 83
1987 June — ISO Standard 8652
Jean Ichbiah (Designer of the «Green Proposal» = Ada language)
You might be confusing the color coded language proposals, of which “green” became Ada, with the statuettes of Lady Ada Lovelace that ACM SIGAda handed out for their annual awards, see ACM SIGAda Awards …
Pebbleman was the first document about creating a software environment for Ada. Stoneman followed, but the program was dropped.
Initial Thoughts on the Pebbleman Process
David Fisher
The above is slightly confusing, because there were 2 different sequences of requirements documents: one for the language (Strawman, Woodenman, Tinman, Ironman, Steelman) and another for a development environment (Sandman, Pebbleman, Stoneman), between 1975 and 1980.
For extensive information on the Ada design process, see “Ada - The Project, The DoD High Order Language Working Group” by William A. Whitaker at [1], originally published in ACM SIGPLAN Notices (Vol. 28, No. 3, March 1993).