Two new bindings on GitHub: ada-imgui + ada-stb, and a questionr

> Two new bindings on GitHub, both MIT:

>

> **[ada-imgui]( GitHub - the-dark-factory/ada-imgui: Dear ImGui 的 Ada 绑定 | Ada bindings to Dear ImGui via cimgui. Immediate-mode GUI. 中文/EN · GitHub )** — Ada

> bindings to Dear ImGui via cimgui. v0.1-dev. Smoke test

> verifies the C++ side links cleanly (Context lifecycle +

> style hooks). The wider widget surface is bound but not

> exercised by the smoke test yet; that’s because the meaningful

> exercise needs a windowing backend (GLFW / SDL / etc.) and

> binding one of those is a separate problem. CHARTER and

> AUDIT files in the repo are honest about what’s tested

> end-to-end and what’s plausible-but-untested.

>

> **[ada-stb]( GitHub - the-dark-factory/ada-stb: Sean Barrett STB 库的 Ada 绑定 | Ada bindings to Sean Barrett's STB header-only utility collection. Image loading and more. 中文/EN · GitHub )** — Ada

> bindings to Sean Barrett’s STB header-only utility headers.

> v0.1-dev. First sub-binding is `Stb.Image` (PNG/JPG/BMP/GIF/

> PSD/TGA/HDR loading). Smoke test loads a real PNG and

> validates dimensions + the allocator hand-off on free.

> Per-header child packages under one umbrella; next planned

> additions are `Stb.Image_Write`, `Stb.Truetype`,

> `Stb.Rect_Pack`.

>

> Both are early. Both build + run on macOS today; Linux is

> untested but the code is portable.

>

> **The reason for posting:** the Projects to Work on list on

> ada-lang.io was the starting point for these two picks. But

> that list is a snapshot, and most static-doc lists go stale

> faster than the community moves. So before picking the next

> piece of work — I’d like to hear what you’d actually reach

> for if you were starting an Ada project today.

This post was caught in the spam filter and the moderation team is unsure whether to allow obviously AI-generated content. I’d like to hear what the community thinks.

I am fine with AI generated content as long as it is not marketing, is not misleading, and most important is focused on Ada, especially if it helps fill a need (eg useful bindings)

I apologise for the splash, I just intended to inform the community of the release of several libraries. I went for an AI announcement as I wanted the note to have all the information.

The note may have all the information, but is not really easy to read.

I recommend to review potential future announcements, and to clean up the layout.

I’ll prefix this by saying that I’m using coding agents for my own Ada learning and coding.

The post leaves an impression of “lowest possible effort” on me, on the same level as most of the spam I see. My expectations on useful contributions to this community are very different.

Please do better next time.